[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done.
From: |
home |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done. |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:01:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.12i |
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:45:39PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> The problem is that ATV is designed for electing one candidate from a
> list, I think, while STV can elect n from it.
Sounds right. I wasn't advocating ATV necessarily; but STV and ATV are
pretty much the same thing anyway.
> I'm not familiar with the TUC, really. What is a composite?
A composite is basically a bunch of motions which you vote on. So voting for
composite A gets you motion A, B, and C, even if you only agree with motions
A and C and not B. Generally, it's a way of speeding things up at the cost
of people occasionally seeing it as a sneaky way of getting motions passed.
> The "meetings" (I do not specify physical meetings) where resolutions
> are made were for the executive, not the membership. I don't know if
> you got that.
I kind of did and didn't, I didn't really connect the two - obviously, a
monthly meeting for an executive is nothing, so you can probably discount my
argument ;)
> > It probably depends on how resolutions are submitted. Generally, they should
> > be proposed by a member and seconded by another. [...]
>
> Agreed. It's a very simple twit filter and probably worth doing, but
> this procedure should be specified in one of the first resolutions, I
> think?
Yep, sounds about right - the voting should be sorted and enshrined as
policy as soon as possible. That way, the way the organisation works would
be clear and transparent to everyone.
> It may be desirable to change such things later and I'd like to
> have as little as possible in the charter that is not the basic
> organisational structure. Is that a worthwhile aim? I don't know.
The charter's probably more about spirit rather than the implementation,
although that necessarily makes it either short or woolly. I think the FSF
equivilent of Asimov's Laws would be near enough a good building block,
since those are terms of reference under which we want to form this
association. The promotion and support of Free Software is our goal - it's
pretty much as simple as that.
Cheers,
Alex.
--
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., (continued)
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., Marc Eberhard, 2001/08/22
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., MJ Ray, 2001/08/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., home, 2001/08/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., markj, 2001/08/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done.,
home <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., MJ Ray, 2001/08/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., Marc Eberhard, 2001/08/31
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., MJ Ray, 2001/08/31
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., Alistair Davidson, 2001/08/31
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., Alistair Davidson, 2001/08/31
Re: [Fsfe-uk] What needs to be done., Marc Eberhard, 2001/08/30