emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: [External] : Re: Propose to add setup-wizard.el to ELPA


From: xenodasein
Subject: Re: FW: [External] : Re: Propose to add setup-wizard.el to ELPA
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:24:00 +0100 (CET)

Jan 3, 2022, 15:55 by luangruo@yahoo.com:

> xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> writes:
>
>> Here's an example of a normal answer you should have given: "I am
>> working on Customize, and would appreciate your time if you can
>> provide the whole article, not just a pointer to internet, and maybe
>> additional comments instead."
>>
>
> And that, except split across a few more messages, is precisely what I
> have been trying to say to you today (specifically, about autoloads and
> custom.)  Your response however is typically a complaint that I'm
> calling you delusional, or harassing you, or calling you a liar, or what
> not, which is again blatantly false.
>

Nope, see what you did was to say that you know what the problem is,
that it is the exact same one with setq, and said it was insignificant and
unrealistic.


> Anyway, unless you're willing to provide some actual information about
> the problem, I will see myself out.  I still oppose the addition of a
> setup wizard that does not generate a custom-set-variables block to
> place in the custom file.
>

I would consider helping If I saw you committing towards integrating
the wizard with custom, not opposing it before it is even born.



>> Now you are expanding the issue, and asking for how autoload problem
>> directly affects the new wizard package, whereas my original mail was
>> only about defaults of custom-file, and your answer was about setq.
>> With deflections like these, it is easy to doubt someone's intentions,
>> so don't blame me.
>>
>
> I suggest you take a look at the title of your reply, if that is what
> your argument is based on.
>
> Further more, it was you who turned the discussion towards setq, and the
> discussion about custom-file is an entirely separate discussion (which
> was also suitably renamed) that involved Philip, Pedro and you, not me.
>
> I was not paying attention to the "default custom file" discussion.
>

So everything written in this list strongly relate to the OP and title, and 
never
diverge.  OK, sorry, my mistake.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]