[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:01:34 -0500 |
I think we should try to fix these two problems now. The first one
should be easy. Meanwhile, I think someone prematurely removed the
item about documenting gpg-agent. People are working on it, but it
hasn't been finished yet.
** make-network-process :nowait t doesn't work for non-local targets
on Windows.
If it cannot be fixed, (featurep 'make-network-process '(:nowait t))
should return nil.
** address@hidden, Nov 24:
gnus-summary-tick-article-forward doesn't work any more?
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/25
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24