[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:29 -0500 |
Unfortunately, I just discovered (by reading the code) that datagram
support is severely broken on Windows -- it can send datagrams, but
not receive them reliably.
So datagram support should probably be disabled too.
Would you please do that? It should be a quick and easy change, right?
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/25
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21