[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:52:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
> Unfortunately, I just discovered (by reading the code) that datagram
> support is severely broken on Windows -- it can send datagrams, but
> not receive them reliably.
> So datagram support should probably be disabled too.
I don't know of any elisp code that uses datagram sockets, so it's not
a big deal, is it?
> IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making
> the Windows port work like the other ports.
I think it only makes sense if it allows simplification of other
(generic) code.
Stefan
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/25
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21