[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:30 -0500 |
> The reason is that improving
> Emacs for Windows alone is not as important as improving it for free
systems.
IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making
the Windows port work like the other ports.
Right, but that is lower priority than making Emacs work better on GNU.
I usually don't spend time on Windows issues myself, and I hope you too
will leave them to others.
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/25
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21