[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:34:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> >> I think we should try to fix these two problems now. The first one
> >> should be easy.
> >> ** make-network-process :nowait t doesn't work for non-local
> >> targets
> >> on Windows.
>
> Well, I might give it a shot after Xmas.
>
> Making the code report that the feature doesn't exist on MS Windows
> has solved the problem. Now we're talking about adding a feature.
Unfortunately, I just discovered (by reading the code) that datagram
support is severely broken on Windows -- it can send datagrams, but
not receive them reliably.
So datagram support should probably be disabled too.
> That shouldn't be done until after the release. But I hope that if
> this is done then, it won't be done by you.
I'd hope so too - but nobody else seems to be capable of understanding
the code...
> The reason is that improving
> Emacs for Windows alone is not as important as improving it for free systems.
IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making
the Windows port work like the other ports.
> You are very capable of making the sorts of improvements that will
> really make Emacs better for users. I hope you will focus on them.
Sure ... I just hope we get Emacs 22 out of the door soon, so we can
get on with some of the projects which have been on-hold for years now.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/25
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21