[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:19:21 +0100 |
On 12/22/06, Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> wrote:
What harm does it make to make the change now then?
It works now (we aren't being floored with complains about the line
endings of [gn]make.defs). Can you guarantee without a doubt that the
change won't bring hell for people who's building just fine at the
moment?
It will be in the release if we make it.
That's not intrinsically good. If it goes in it should be for a reason.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22