[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:41:16 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:18:10 +0100
> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> CC: Jason Rumney <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> >
> > 2000-09-03 Andrew Innes <address@hidden>
> >
> > * makefile.w32-in: Change to DOS line endings.
> >
> > So I guess there _was_ a good reason for this, at least in the past,
> > and we better leave it that way, at least until after the release.
>
> Could the reason be that the output from configure.bat has DOS line
> endings?
Probably, some version of Make didn't like Unix EOLs.
> nd/Makefile now has mixed line endings and that looks fragile to me.
After the release, I will convert gmake.defs and nmake.defs to DOS EOL
format. I don't want to touch them now, as no one complained that it
interferes with the build.
- nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/20
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/21
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22