[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
|
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
|
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:41:27 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> It is an API change (in the handling of SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2) - so it would
> definitely be better to get them done before the release!!
>
> If we agree to roll a new pretest soon, I can make the necessary changes
> later today or tomorrow...
I just installed the changes (including docs).
So there's one less excuse for not make a new pretest ...
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21