[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:38:32 +1300 |
Chong Yidong writes:
> "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 2006/10/27 - 22.0.90
> > 2006/11/18 - 22.0.91
> > 2006/12/18 - waiting... :)
>
> It's been waiting on a few big issues, including the now-resolved
> C-mode slowness problem. The main sticking point now is the signal
> handling stuff that Kim started up about two weeks ago. I have no
> idea what's going on over there.
I think each pretest tarball should be a release candidate. So I can't see the
point of a new pretest while bugs are still listed in FOR-RELEASE, other than
to create the illusion that the release is getting nearer.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20