Re: How about a new pretest?

[Kim F. Storm]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:54:15 -0500
>> Cc: Emacs Devel <address@hidden>
>> 
>> "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > 2006/10/27 - 22.0.90
>> > 2006/11/18 - 22.0.91
>> > 2006/12/18 - waiting... :)
>> 
>> It's been waiting on a few big issues, including the now-resolved
>> C-mode slowness problem.  The main sticking point now is the signal
>> handling stuff that Kim started up about two weeks ago.  I have no
>> idea what's going on over there.
>
> If the problem with C-mode slowness was resolved, I'd suggest to make
> a new pretest.
>
> Kim, are your proposed changes important enough to wait for them?  For
> that matter, can they wait until after the release?

It is an API change (in the handling of SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2) - so it would
definitely be better to get them done before the release!!

If we agree to roll a new pretest soon, I can make the necessary changes
later today or tomorrow...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk