[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:13:13 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:54:15 -0500
> Cc: Emacs Devel <address@hidden>
>
> "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 2006/10/27 - 22.0.90
> > 2006/11/18 - 22.0.91
> > 2006/12/18 - waiting... :)
>
> It's been waiting on a few big issues, including the now-resolved
> C-mode slowness problem. The main sticking point now is the signal
> handling stuff that Kim started up about two weeks ago. I have no
> idea what's going on over there.
If the problem with C-mode slowness was resolved, I'd suggest to make
a new pretest.
Kim, are your proposed changes important enough to wait for them? For
that matter, can they wait until after the release?
- How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21