[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:30:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> It is an API change (in the handling of SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2) - so it would
>> definitely be better to get them done before the release!!
>>
>> If we agree to roll a new pretest soon, I can make the necessary changes
>> later today or tomorrow...
>
> I just installed the changes (including docs).
>
> So there's one less excuse for not make a new pretest ...
Indeed, there seem to be no more technical issues left in FOR-RELEASE,
so I've rolled a new tarball. 22.0.92 is now available at the usual
spot:
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-22.0.92.tar.gz
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-22.0.91-22.0.92.xdelta.sig
- How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Chong Yidong, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/18
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/19
- Re: How about a new pretest?, David Kastrup, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22