[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about a new pretest?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: How about a new pretest? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:30:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Unfortunately, I just discovered (by reading the code) that datagram
> support is severely broken on Windows -- it can send datagrams, but
> not receive them reliably.
>
> So datagram support should probably be disabled too.
>
> Would you please do that? It should be a quick and easy change, right?
Yes. Done.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: How about a new pretest?, (continued)
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/20
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/21
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/22
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/23
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/24
- Re: How about a new pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/21