[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?
From: |
Ben Laurie |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:53:04 +0000 |
Data file is rather large, due to me taking quite a while to find the
copter after the crash... I'll send it offlist.
On 26 March 2014 20:59, Gautier Hattenberger
<address@hidden> wrote:
> yes, .data file is needed to replay the flight, maybe we'll see if the
> waypoints have been incorrectly moved when doing geo init.
>
> Gautier
>
> Le 26/03/2014 21:21, Ben Laurie a écrit :
>
> On 26 March 2014 14:50, Gautier Hattenberger
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are some recent changes in ins_reset functions, but I made a
> successful flight last week with an ARdrone.
> What is your flight plan ?
>
> Flight plan is the standard rotorcraft_basic plan.
>
> current and last working version ?
>
> Current version is ad7994c7efc81b725823efff44e9ee9b83fe76bc, previous
> working version was last year some time before xmas (can probably work
> out exact version if needed). Been rather busy this year, was my first
> chance to fly!
>
> maybe your
> flight log would help.
>
> log attached - do you need the .data file, too?
>
> Gautier
>
> Le 26/03/2014 15:17, Ben Laurie a écrit :
>
> Nearly lost my ardrone today ... latest master (plus my local stuff,
> which is mostly just calibration) from 3 days ago. Took off, was fine.
> Changed to "stay_p1" and it immediately started climbing, fast.
> Switched to "land" before it went completely out of sight, which
> luckily it did kinda do, though it ended up more-or-less out of
> control and quite some way away where it hit trees. Possibly because
> it thought it was landed well above ground level? Dunno.
>
> Anyway, it looks like the waypoints are set to 200m above ground level
> (207.78, to be precise) ... which is not what they used to do when GPS
> lock is achieved and they all relocate.
>
> Did something change?
>
> BTW, I should have video, might be quite amusing :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
- [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?,
Ben Laurie <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Stephen L Hulme, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/27
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/28
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/28
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/29
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Gautier Hattenberger, 2014/03/29
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Change in altitude handling?, Ben Laurie, 2014/03/29