Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hello,

Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend
>> `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices:
>>
>>   'inactive-not-standalone
>>     'active-not-standalone
>>            'not-standalone
>
> This is a different idea. The change would happen at the exporter level,
> not at parser's.
>
>> When set to 'not-standalone, it means export time-stamps except
>> "standone time-stamps", i.e. those who are alone on a line.
>
> Well, parsing is not line based, and "a timestamp alone on a line"
> doesn't mean much. Though, "a timestamp alone in a paragraph" is much
> easier to translate. IOW:
>
>   <2013-04-13 Sat>
>   is not a standalone timestamp (use M-q).
>
> but,
>
>   <2013-04-13 Sat>
>
>   is a standalone timestamp.

Wouldn't it be a good moment to introduce

  APPT: <2013-04-13 Sat>

or maybe better named

  EVENT: <2013-04-13 Sat>

for things that only apply for today?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban