Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

[Bastien]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Is that OK with you?

I still resist this idea.

I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend
`org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices:

  'inactive-not-standalone
    'active-not-standalone
           'not-standalone

When set to 'not-standalone, it means export time-stamps except
"standone time-stamps", i.e. those who are alone on a line.  That's
the set-up most users will want after t, it fits the habits that
Bernt has been describing, and it's useful for users who wants to
get rid of the planning-like active time-stamp right below the
headline.

Also, it's easier to explain users how to set this up (through
the docstring) than to explain why time-stamps are not removed in
tables with (setq org-export-with-timestamps nil).

-- 
 Bastien