Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

[Bastien]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)?

Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here

* Task
  <2013-04-14 dim.>
  <2013-04-16 dim.>

because

  <2013-04-14 dim.>
  <2013-04-16 dim.>

is a paragraph.  (The agenda takes both time-stamps into
account in a simple `org-agenda-list'.)  If we can remove
the one-time-stamp only case, but not the case with two,
it is too confusing IMHO.

What do you think?

-- 
 Bastien