Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Bastien <address@hidden> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)?
>
> Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here
>
> * Task
>   <2013-04-14 dim.>
>   <2013-04-16 dim.>
>
> because
>
>   <2013-04-14 dim.>
>   <2013-04-16 dim.>
>
> is a paragraph.  (The agenda takes both time-stamps into
> account in a simple `org-agenda-list'.)  If we can remove
> the one-time-stamp only case, but not the case with two,
> it is too confusing IMHO.

Correct.

> What do you think?

We can widen the definition of `standalone': a standalone timestamp is
a timestamp belonging to a paragraph that contains only timestamps
objects.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou