Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

[Bastien]

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend
>> `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices:
>>
>>   'inactive-not-standalone
>>     'active-not-standalone
>>            'not-standalone
>
> This is a different idea. The change would happen at the exporter level,
> not at parser's.

Yes.

> If we agree to the "alone in a paragraph" part, I can implement it.
>
> But we still need exceptions for clocks and timestamps (i.e., ignore
> `org-export-with-timestamps' value when `org-export-with-planning' or
> `org-export-with-clocks' is non-nil).

Let's not implement my proposal and stick to your implementation of
the exceptions you first proposed.

I expect users will want a way to get rid of <time-stamp> in

* Task
  <time-stamp>

without getting rid of time-stamps in paragraphs, but this can be
tackled later on I guess.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien