[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:12:24 +0200 |
This looks good to me - with my limited understanding of the exporter lingo.
Thanks!
- Carsten
On 10 apr. 2013, at 14:43, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Some people throw in time stamps often while they work, just
>> as a little label, indicating that they were working on this
>> at a specific date, or that the entry was created on a specific
>> date. Many people I know have a hook that throws in such a
>> time stamp in each new entry created. This creates a lot of
>> clutter when you print it, which is why you can turn off
>> export of timestamps.
>>
>> That option was not meant for a contextual line like your
>> first example. If you use the time stamps in this way, you
>> probably will not turn off timestamp export at all, you
>> will just leave it on. If you mix both ways of using
>> time stamps - well, too bad.
>>
>> Tabular data is different because you certainly wanted
>> that data in the table, so removing it will be confusing.
>>
>>> Anyway, there's still another thing to ponder. Since everything in
>>> a table is data, what happens with "tex:nil" (LaTeX snippets)? Should
>>> this option also be ignored within a table? If not, how can we explain
>>> the difference with "<:nil"?
>>
>> Tex macros are different. This is an internal way of
>> inserting special characters, and that syntax may get into
>> your way in some specific projects. Just like the fact
>> that _ creates a subscript. If you have to write text
>> with lots of _ but you never mean a subscript, this can
>> be really annoying. So you can turn off subscripts as you
>> can turn off interpretation of tex macros, as a convenience
>> if the syntax gets in your way. Then it should be turned
>> off anywhere, table or not.
>
> Fair enough. The following patch should do as decided in this thread.
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
> From a2b4ef1ad24cbd816491122d0e969fecc6739377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:38:13 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ox: Don't skip timestamps within tables
>
> * lisp/ox.el (org-export--skip-p): Never skip a timestamp within
> a table.
> (org-export-with-timestamps): Update docstring accordingly.
> * testing/lisp/test-ox.el: Add test.
> ---
> lisp/ox.el | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> testing/lisp/test-ox.el | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/ox.el b/lisp/ox.el
> index 7f33755..a9667d9 100644
> --- a/lisp/ox.el
> +++ b/lisp/ox.el
> @@ -721,6 +721,9 @@ It can be set to `active', `inactive', t or nil, in order
> to
> export, respectively, only active timestamps, only inactive ones,
> all of them or none.
>
> +This variable has no effect on timestamps within tables, which
> +will always be exported.
> +
> This option can also be set with the OPTIONS keyword, e.g.
> \"<:nil\"."
> :group 'org-export-general
> @@ -2013,19 +2016,22 @@ a tree with a select tag."
> (not (org-export-get-previous-element blob options))))
> (table-row (org-export-table-row-is-special-p blob options))
> (timestamp
> - (case (plist-get options :with-timestamps)
> - ;; No timestamp allowed.
> - ('nil t)
> - ;; Only active timestamps allowed and the current one isn't
> - ;; active.
> - (active
> - (not (memq (org-element-property :type blob)
> - '(active active-range))))
> - ;; Only inactive timestamps allowed and the current one isn't
> - ;; inactive.
> - (inactive
> - (not (memq (org-element-property :type blob)
> - '(inactive inactive-range))))))))
> + ;; Timestamps in tables are not affected by `:with-timestamps'.
> + (unless (eq (org-element-type (org-export-get-parent-element blob))
> + 'table-row)
> + (case (plist-get options :with-timestamps)
> + ;; No timestamp allowed.
> + ('nil t)
> + ;; Only active timestamps allowed and the current one isn't
> + ;; active.
> + (active
> + (not (memq (org-element-property :type blob)
> + '(active active-range))))
> + ;; Only inactive timestamps allowed and the current one isn't
> + ;; inactive.
> + (inactive
> + (not (memq (org-element-property :type blob)
> + '(inactive inactive-range)))))))))
>
>
> ;;; The Transcoder
> diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-ox.el b/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
> index 6203f8b..0900037 100644
> --- a/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
> +++ b/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
> @@ -408,7 +408,12 @@ Paragraph"
> "<2012-04-29 sun. 10:45>\n"))
> (should
> (equal (org-export-as 'test nil nil nil '(:with-timestamps inactive))
> - "[2012-04-29 sun. 10:45]\n")))))
> + "[2012-04-29 sun. 10:45]\n"))))
> + (should
> + (equal "| [2012-03-29 Thu] |\n"
> + (org-test-with-temp-text "| [2012-03-29 Thu] |"
> + (org-test-with-backend test
> + (org-export-as 'test nil nil nil '(:with-timestamps nil)))))))
>
> (ert-deftest test-org-export/comment-tree ()
> "Test if export process ignores commented trees."
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
- [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bernt Hansen, 2013/04/07
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Mike McLean, 2013/04/07
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/08
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bernt Hansen, 2013/04/08
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Carsten Dominik, 2013/04/08
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/08
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Carsten Dominik, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/10
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bastien, 2013/04/10
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/11
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bastien, 2013/04/11
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/13
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bastien, 2013/04/13
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/13
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/04/13
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bastien, 2013/04/14
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Bastien, 2013/04/14
- Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/04/14