Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks

[Sebastián Monía]

Thierry Volpiatto <thievol@posteo.net> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there any reason not to merge your latest patch while we wait for
>> deprecating EWW's bookmarks to happen?  Adam says that it's already an
>> improvement, and I'd agree if it means replacing bespoke code with using
>> vtable.  From a cursory look, I don't see anything controversial in
>> there.
>>
>> Adam also asked for people to speak up if they object to the patch over
>> a week ago, and no one did.
>
> If you plan to move to emacs bookmarks, I see no reasons to use vtable,
> it will complicate conversion of eww bookmarks to bookmarks which is
> actually trivial. 

Adam already hinted it in his reply, but this patch doesn't change the
internal representation of EWW-bookmarks.

A minor update, I have started using M-n and M-b and relying on the
bookmark order to navigate them. We don't have any statistics, of
course, but I suspect the feature is largely unknown.
It's interesting. I suspect I found it useful because I don't use a feed
reader, most people would use elfeed/newsticker instead.
It is also relatively easy to write a similar command using the more
generic bookmarks.