bibledit-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [be] future bibledit


From: Kari Valkama
Subject: Re: [be] future bibledit
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:09:56 +0200

Hi Teus, 

What do you think of HTML 5 and JavaScript? 
I understand that the proponents of HTML 5 and Javascript say that those tools 
are enough to write complete applications, without PHP. Thus I am interested in 
hearing your arguments against that in comparison of PHP. 

Yours,
Kari


Teus Benschop kirjoitti 9.3.2010 kello 13.06:

> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 07:55 +1300, Robert Hunt wrote:
> [...]
>> My concern is the reliability of the net connection -- it must have good 
>> offline capability.
>> 
> This is a concern in this part of the world too. It is going to have
> "seamless" off-line capability, well not completely seamless, as long as
> "Send/Receive" is considered good enough for people to work with.
> 
>> Have you considered using Python instead of PHP?
> 
> I didn't consider Python, but considered Ruby, Ruby on Rails, CakePHP,
> Zend Framework, and some other frameworks, but at the end settled for
> PHP as this was perceived in my mind as being flexible enough and with
> enough support to even let it to weird and unusual things, and PHP is
> used by many web based applications around the world.
> 
> Teus.
> 
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]