[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [be] future bibledit
From: |
Kari Valkama |
Subject: |
Re: [be] future bibledit |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:09:56 +0200 |
Hi Teus,
What do you think of HTML 5 and JavaScript?
I understand that the proponents of HTML 5 and Javascript say that those tools
are enough to write complete applications, without PHP. Thus I am interested in
hearing your arguments against that in comparison of PHP.
Yours,
Kari
Teus Benschop kirjoitti 9.3.2010 kello 13.06:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 07:55 +1300, Robert Hunt wrote:
> [...]
>> My concern is the reliability of the net connection -- it must have good
>> offline capability.
>>
> This is a concern in this part of the world too. It is going to have
> "seamless" off-line capability, well not completely seamless, as long as
> "Send/Receive" is considered good enough for people to work with.
>
>> Have you considered using Python instead of PHP?
>
> I didn't consider Python, but considered Ruby, Ruby on Rails, CakePHP,
> Zend Framework, and some other frameworks, but at the end settled for
> PHP as this was perceived in my mind as being flexible enough and with
> enough support to even let it to weird and unusual things, and PHP is
> used by many web based applications around the world.
>
> Teus.
>
>
- Re: [be] future bibledit, (continued)
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Robert Hunt, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, David Gardner, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Dan Dennison, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/10
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit,
Kari Valkama <=
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Kari Valkama, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Wolfgang Stradner E, 2010/03/10