[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [be] future bibledit
From: |
Kari Valkama |
Subject: |
Re: [be] future bibledit |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:36:09 +0200 |
Hi Teus,
Thanks for your good response.
Is the development modular in a way that if I find a volunteer in Finland who
would like to contribute in the work, would it be possible to do?
Yours,
Kari
Teus Benschop kirjoitti 9.3.2010 kello 15.30:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:09 +0200, Kari Valkama wrote:
>> What do you think of HTML 5 and JavaScript?
>> I understand that the proponents of HTML 5 and Javascript say that those
>> tools are enough to write complete applications, without PHP. Thus I am
>> interested in hearing your arguments against that in comparison of PHP.
>
> It may have to be shown by example how HTML 5 and Javascript are enough
> to write complete applications, and in particular how such combination
> would deal with persistence tools such as databases on the server. Since
> traditionally PHP and similar languages have been used to create web
> based applications, I believe that the burden of proof lies with the
> proponents of HTML 5 and Javascript.
>
> Another area of concern might be how far HTML 5 is being supported by
> browsers that run on traditional desktops, on netbooks, tablets, in cell
> phones and on smart phones. All these devices are now currently in use
> and bibledit aims at a situation that users of these can access its
> translation services.
>
> I do however have no argument against HTML 5 and Javascript provided
> that all the target devices mentioned above support it, and welcome
> suggestions such as you make.
>
> Bibledit-web now tries to use HTML and CSS and PHP, as a tried and
> proven set of tools.
>
> Teus.
>
>
>
- Re: [be] future bibledit, (continued)
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Dan Dennison, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/10
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Kari Valkama, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit,
Kari Valkama <=
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Wolfgang Stradner E, 2010/03/10