[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [be] future bibledit
From: |
Teus Benschop |
Subject: |
Re: [be] future bibledit |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:06:38 +0200 |
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 07:55 +1300, Robert Hunt wrote:
[...]
> My concern is the reliability of the net connection -- it must have good
> offline capability.
>
This is a concern in this part of the world too. It is going to have
"seamless" off-line capability, well not completely seamless, as long as
"Send/Receive" is considered good enough for people to work with.
> Have you considered using Python instead of PHP?
I didn't consider Python, but considered Ruby, Ruby on Rails, CakePHP,
Zend Framework, and some other frameworks, but at the end settled for
PHP as this was perceived in my mind as being flexible enough and with
enough support to even let it to weird and unusual things, and PHP is
used by many web based applications around the world.
Teus.
- Re: [be] future bibledit, (continued)
- Re: [be] future bibledit, David Gardner, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Robert Hunt, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, David Gardner, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Dan Dennison, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/10
- Re: [be] future bibledit,
Teus Benschop <=
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Kari Valkama, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Kari Valkama, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
Re: [be] future bibledit, Wolfgang Stradner E, 2010/03/10