[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [be] future bibledit
From: |
David Gardner |
Subject: |
Re: [be] future bibledit |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:30:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:55:54AM +1300, Robert Hunt wrote:
> My concern is the reliability of the net connection -- it must have
> good offline capability.
>
> Have you considered using Python instead of PHP?
>
> Robert.
>
I'd really like to second that idea.
I've written very little python and too much PHP, but I'd far rather debug
python code than the mess it's too easy to make in PHP.
Also, it seems to me that python's object-orientation is more "convinced"
than PHP's, which has always seemed as a bit of an afterthought...
So I'd have thought that that would be an easier transition from bibledit's
C++
David
- [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Oreo Warpok, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, David Gardner, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Robert Hunt, 2010/03/08
- Re: [be] future bibledit,
David Gardner <=
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Dan Dennison, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Neil Mayhew, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/10
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Kari Valkama, 2010/03/09
- Re: [be] future bibledit, Teus Benschop, 2010/03/09