Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: STK500 version 2.0 protocol

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Matthias Weißer wrote:

> I think it's better to have two different programmers. So it's
> easier to maintain the code. The protocoll is totaly different so
> that we would have a big if-condition in every function to decide
> which one should be used. It's IMHO a better way to split up in two
> different programmers.

Couldn't this be handled effectively by function pointers?

So use an stk500 set of function pointers, and if/when the init
function detects a newer firmware, it can simply switch the set of
function pointers to the stk500v2 one.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)