Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc

[Ruddick Lawrence]

Ok, I'm going to go ahead and make the call that it's named AVR Core Library
(avr-corelib) since it seems well received and choosing one will allow us to
move onto other issues.

Frederic said he might be gone for the weekend, and he hasn't given me any
privileges on the sourceforge account yet, so setting up the mailing list
(and changing the project name) will probably have to wait until he's back.

Ruddick

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Weddington, Eric <address@hidden
> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > address@hidden
> > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington<avr-libc-dev-bounces%2Beric.weddington>
> address@hidden
> > org] On Behalf Of Ruddick Lawrence
> > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:24 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon
> > AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
> >
> > The only problem I see with AVR Core is this:
> > http://www.opencores.org/project,avr_core
> >
> > Despite it not being as "cool", does anyone have any
> > objections to calling
> > the project AVR Core Library (avr-corelib)? Eric, you can
> > still call it "The
> > Core" :)
> >
>
> Cool, another vote! I'm good with AVR Core Library (avr-corelib).
>