RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:20 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon 
> AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
> 
> 
> One can change the UNIX name once every 6 month and it takes 48hours:
> "Project rename requests are a non-reversible action, and you may only
> request a project rename operation once every six (6) months. This
> action will be carried out within fourty-eight (48) hours"
>

Oh! That's something new that SourceForge must of added. I stand corrected 
then! :-)

 
> I could chage the "header name" for something less confusing. Any
> quick suggestion for that? Maybe just remove the C(AVR Library)? Or
> maybe core set?
>
>
> Yes it is confusing with the avr-libc name and I'm sorry about that
> confusion. I'm pretty sure that picking anyother name would have raise
> "yet another" issue (if you get my point).
> 
> Since there quite few things that we already started discussing in
> that one big thread(project name, coding convention, interrupts in
> library or not, etc), I took the liberty to have a place to discuss
> that out of the avr-libc mailing list.

Ok. But wait on setting up mailing lists, unless you're absolutely sure that we 
can change *those* names after they've been created. ;-)

Thanks for setting up a project! 

Now let's figure out a name!

I like what you said above, about 'core set'. How about calling it "AVR Core 
Library" or shorter, "AVR Core". That way we can refer to it on the mailing 
lists as "The Core" so now it sounds like any smart AVR programmer just has to 
have such a core library. ;-)