[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Source code, git and cvs
From: |
uzibalqa |
Subject: |
Re: Source code, git and cvs |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2023 10:59:38 +0000 |
------- Original Message -------
On Friday, July 21st, 2023 at 10:43 PM, uzibalqa <uzibalqa@proton.me> wrote:
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Friday, July 21st, 2023 at 6:12 PM, Po Lu luangruo@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org writes:
> >
> > > > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:10:56 +0000
> > > > From: uzibalqa uzibalqa@proton.me
> > > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> > > >
> > > > Yet you continue to refuse spending effort on making sure that future
> > > > developers
> > > > will be able to learn quickly.
> > >
> > > You can write whatever you like: paper won't blush. But nothing is
> > > farther from the truth, and if someone wants to have an independent
> > > opinion, they should just look at my commit trail.
> >
> > fatiparty, uzibalqa, emacsq, goncholden, Christopher Dimech, whoever you
> > are:
It seems there are many people you don't like.
> > From March 2022 onwards, you have been sporadically posting to this list
> > under various identities, seeking help with problems rising from
> > incomplete or incorrect understandings of Emacs documentation, or
> > unreasonable expectations thereof. Each time an Emacs developer tries
> > to assist you, or points out the pertinent documentation, you find a
> > contrived fault with that documentation or the behavior of said Emacs
> > developer. Name-calling promptly follows, mostly from you.
>
>
> Yes, because things are not as good as many believe they are. It is only
> a belief. And then we start again with the usual confidence friends declaring
> how my expectations are unreasonable. If I work on something, will they get
> accepted ? Hell no ! So then one wonders about some behavior.
>
> > Multiple individuals have already castigated you for this behavior,
> > whatever the reason for it may be. Continuing to interact this way
> > would be to your detriment, assuming that you want to continue receiving
> > help from the readers of this list (which is doubtful.)
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, (continued)
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/20
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Po Lu, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs,
uzibalqa <=
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, tomas, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, Po Lu, 2023/07/21
- Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21
- RE: [External] : Re: Source code, git and cvs, Drew Adams, 2023/07/21
- RE: [External] : Re: Source code, git and cvs, uzibalqa, 2023/07/21