Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.

[Patrice Dumas]

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 04:08:16PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> 
> Sure, braces involving @-commands have to be properly matching.
> That is fine.  But what about when @-commands aren't involved?
> E.g., I think:
> 
> @html
> {
> @end html
> 
> should be valid.  Otherwise "raw" loses its meaning.  Do you agree?

What I can easily do is to pass lone { and } unmodified when they are
right below the raw command, but if within an @-command matching 
braces are considered.

Is it right?

-- 
Pat