[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:08:16 -0800 |
I answered too rapidly... They have to be matching because
@-commands with braces are taken into account.
Sure, braces involving @-commands have to be properly matching.
That is fine. But what about when @-commands aren't involved?
E.g., I think:
@html
{
@end html
should be valid. Otherwise "raw" loses its meaning. Do you agree?
The purpose of raw blocks is not to support @-commands, after all.
That's strictly secondary. So if it's not possible to do both, we
should rethink the @-commands.
k
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., (continued)
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/26
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/27
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/31
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/28
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/29
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/29
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/25