[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:44:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:31:50PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> So, matching { and } are to accepted, I think. But non matching (in
> the block version, in @inlineraw, they have to be matching)?
>
> Why should they have to be matching? I don't think that should be required.
Ok.
> As for @inlineraw, in TeX, using bare braces doesn't work at all, people
> have to use @[lr]bracechar. So whatever behavior you want to implement
> there is fine, people won't be able to count on anything in particular.
Ok too.
--
Pat
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/19
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/26
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/27
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/31
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/28
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/29