[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:37:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 03:58:39PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Patrice,
>
> If I am not wrong this would mean that the main difference with
> normal Texinfo code would be that text would be raw text, that is,
> no escaping of special characters.
>
> It's true that one of the original ideas of the raw blocks was to allow
> use of bare { and } without causing errors. Important for TeX, although
> braces are not a big part of html|xml|docbook.
So, matching { and } are to accepted, I think. But non matching (in the
block version, in @inlineraw, they have to be matching)?
--
Pat
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/19
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/26
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/27
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/31