[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:31:50 -0800 |
So, matching { and } are to accepted, I think. But non matching (in
the block version, in @inlineraw, they have to be matching)?
Why should they have to be matching? I don't think that should be required.
As for @inlineraw, in TeX, using bare braces doesn't work at all, people
have to use @[lr]bracechar. So whatever behavior you want to implement
there is fine, people won't be able to count on anything in particular.
k
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/19
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/26
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/27
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/31
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/28