[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Dec 2011 14:59:24 -0800 |
But having a new context in which the only recognized @-commands are
the @-commands escaping @, } { and , should not be that hard.
(and \)
But what about switching to actually executing "most" commands, when
they make sense? Since that is what C makeinfo did, apparently. How
hard would that be, any idea?
If that is a lot harder, we can try accepting the "character" commands
only inside raw text, and see what happens with users. It would mean a
discrepancy between texinfo.tex and tp, but that doesn't seem critical.
k
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/19
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/24
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc.,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/25
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/26
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/27
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Patrice Dumas, 2011/12/30
- Re: spec for @inlinehtml etc., Karl Berry, 2011/12/30