[Mldonkey-users] Re: Swamping by LowID-Clients cause queue dropouts

[Sven Hartge]

Jörg Maisenbacher <address@hidden> wrote:

> So i consider this an approach in a good direction. As for me, this only 
> had positive effects:

Of course, this is only a crude work-around for the problem.

>    *) mem-usage: 37M, downloading 9 popular files

I download many rare files, with Overnet off, my mem usage is at 12M.

>    *) only a few negative next-retry-delays
>       (i consider this as fewer queue-dropouts)
>      => more dwnloads from emules

Uptime: 51470 seconds (0+14:17)
      Client| seen      |  Downloads       |  Uploads         |  Banned
------------+-----------+------------------+------------------+----------
Total       | 66622     |  201.4   4.0     |   73.2   1.5     | 1402   2%
eDonkey     |  8883  13%|   88.9   1.8  44%|   27.2   0.5  37%|    0   0%
old mldonkey|    28   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0   0%
new mldonkey|  1263   2%|   17.7   0.4   9%|    7.1   0.1  10%|    0   0%
Overnet     |     0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0   0%
old eMule   |     0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0   0%
new eMule   | 56147  84%|   94.9   1.9  47%|   38.8   0.8  53%| 1402 100%
trusted mld |   275   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0   0%

This is a very good ratio for eMules, considerung some days ago, where
99% of my few bytes came from edonkey and other mldonkeys.

S°

-- 
BOFH excuse #134:

because of network lag due to too many people playing deathmatch