[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?
|
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed? |
|
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 20:25:07 +0000 |
Per Bothner <address@hidden> writes:
> Nic Ferrier wrote:
> > I'd be happy to change it to be flush with the beginning of the
> > line. We can easily have emacs java mode updated.
>
> I'd prefer 'extends' and 'implements' to be indented.
> Likewise for 'throws', if on a separate line.
Perhaps you and Brian can fight about it and get back to us?
Nic
- [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Aaron M. Renn, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Tom Tromey, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Tom Tromey, 2002/01/31
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Bryce McKinlay, 2002/01/31