javaweb-people
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?


From: Nic Ferrier
Subject: Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?
Date: 31 Jan 2002 20:12:47 +0000

"Etienne M. Gagnon" <address@hidden> writes:

> Tom Tromey wrote: 
>  
> >>>>>>"Nic" == Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes: 
> >>>>>> 
> >  
> > Nic> If everyone's agreed then I'll start thinking about how to update 
> > Nic> indent. 
> >  
> > I think it looks fine. 
> >  
>  
> It looks OK to me, but please be carefull not to forget to handle things like 
>  
> "annonymous classes" and "inner classes" well. 
>  
> e.g. 
>  
> ... 
>    some_var = new WindowListenerAdapter() 
>      { 
>         void some_method() 
>         { 
>            ... 
>         } 
>      }.some_method_call(); 
> ... 
>  

I thought about putting them in the example... but I'm not sure
whether we should specify them or not.

Anybody else have any views?


Nic




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]