Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?

[Bryce McKinlay]

Brian Jones wrote:

> Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I think that our code style for Java looks like this:
> >
> >
> > class X
> >  extends Y
> >  implements Z
>
> This is the only part that looks funky to me.  It's clearly readable
> but I don't think any of our code uses it.

I would prefer

class X extends Y implement Z

because

a) Its what everything already uses
b) Its rare for a class name and supertype list to be so long that it 
needs to be split onto multiple lines.

Other than that I think this looks fine.

regards

Bryce.