Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?

[Nic Ferrier]

Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:

> Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes: 
>  
> > Therefore, if I may, I'd like to take the decision that we DO indent 
> > these decls. 
>  
> I wasn't disagreeing with the indention, it's just that typically it 
> isn't required because the whole thing fits neatly on a single line 
> already.  I guess something that throws multiple exceptions and 
> implements multiple interefaces will look like below? 
>  
> public class foo 
>   extends elmo 
>   implements Bar, 
>    Tom, 
>    HenryInterface 
>   throws BadDataException, 
>     IllegalFormatError 
> { 
> ... 

I hope not.

This is the syntax I use in Paperclips:

 public class foo 
   extends elmo 
   implements Bar, Tom, HenryInterface, ANInterface
     AnotherInterface
 { 


btw I don't think a class can throw an exception /8->

Here's a method decl with a long exception list:

  public void someMethod (String a)
    throws IOException, IllegalStateException, 
        ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
  {
    ...
  }

In other words the decls get their own lines but are then treated in
much the same way as argument lists.

That seems logical to me.


Is it acceptable?


Nic