fsfe-uk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Copyright vs. Copyleft


From: Lee Braiden
Subject: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Copyright vs. Copyleft
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:34:31 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Macintosh/20041103)

Chris Croughton wrote:

Take Zlib for example. That software is licensed saying (paraphrased):

 Keep the authors' names on it, don't pretend you wrote it when you
 didn't.

 If you change it, say so and don't pretend that we put in the bugs
 that you added.

 Keep this notice in the code.

If you get a copy of Zlib, that is free, you can run it, study it,
change it, rebuild it and distribute it as you like.  MS can also do
those things, but they don't (because it's not copylefted) have to give
you or anyone else their changes.  /Their version/ is not free software,
but that does not affect in any way the version you have, that is still
free software.
But that making the very big assumption that you *do have* a copy. If someone *else* has a copy, they are not even required to supply it to you, never mind supply it in tact. Without copyright, your own ISP can take the code as soon as you upload, and put their own name on it. Not even those few simple requests by zlib authors would be kept in tact, much less free software.

- Lee.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]