|
From: | James Heald |
Subject: | Re: MEP positions (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Swpat directive passed by 7 votes.) |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 2004 12:51:07 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Tom Chance wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2004 21:56, MJ Ray wrote:On 2004-05-20 15:50:57 +0100 Telsa Gwynne <address@hidden> wrote:Like this one? http://www.ffii.org.uk/analysis_uk.htmlYes, that sort of thing, but also for the other votes of interest in the last session. Also, produce regional version and summaries, and try to do the same for candidate question responses.We'd aim to do something far more readable too. The FFII one isn't exactly easy to read. Friends of the Earth have an excellent example of what we could do:http://www.foeeurope.org/euvotewatch/ Regards, Tom
FoE's maths is bizarre though -- they count a 'no show' as equivalent to a full vote against.
Note that on swpat we also have most of the party lines for the votes which were not recorded.
http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/plen0309/vote/index.en.htmlIt might be worth somebody putting together a summary, to keep the candidates honest at the event this evening in London.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |