Re: repo criteria changes

[hi]

26 Jun 2021 12:58:45 bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community>:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:44:38 -0400 Richard wrote:
>>   <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license)
>>       for works for practical use, in publicly accessible
>>       repos. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>
>>
>>   <li id="A4-1"><p>Does not permit nonsharing licenses (or lack of
>>       license) for any works in publicly accessible
>>       repos. <strong>(A4-1)</strong></p></li>
>
> there does not seem to be any value in the A4/A4-1 separation -
> the "any works" in A4-1, makes A4 redundant

Neither A4 not A4-1 is the subset of the other.

Let's say the forge allows a certain game repo with code (practical) and assets 
(nonpractical).

- if the code is licensed under a free license but assets is nonsharing (eg all 
rights reserved) then A4 is satisfied but not A4-1
- if the code is under a sharing but nonfree license and the assets are under a 
sharing license then A4-1 is satisfied but not A4.