[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: repo criteria changes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: repo criteria changes |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:32:09 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Let's say the forge allows a certain game repo with code (practical) and
assets (nonpractical).
> - if the code is licensed under a free license but assets is nonsharing (eg
all rights reserved) then A4 is satisfied but not A4-1
> - if the code is under a sharing but nonfree license and the assets are
under a sharing license then A4-1 is satisfied but not A4.
You understand it right.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: repo criteria changes, (continued)
- Re: repo criteria changes, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/24
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/25
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: repo criteria changes, hi, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/16