Re: repo criteria changes

[bill-auger]

On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:46:23 +0000 (UTC) hi@ypei.me wrote:
> - if the code is licensed under a free license but assets is nonsharing (eg 
> all rights reserved) then A4 is satisfied but not A4-1
> - if the code is under a sharing but nonfree license and the assets are under 
> a sharing license then A4-1 is satisfied but not A4.

yes, after some though, i see the informational value in
distinguishing them

the problem is: if A4.1 is not satisfied, then the code-base, as
a whole, is not distributable at all

even if A4.1 is satisfied, it is still possible (perhaps quite
likely) that the code-base, as a whole, is not commercially
distributable

either scenario makes the passing A4 deceptive and moot - so,
even if A4 and A4.1 are each significant and coherent together,
the combination is likely to be misleading