Re: repo criteria changes

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

I think you are right about "publicly accessible".

It is important to rule out lack of license.

I don't want to make the requirement more strict by requiring works of
art and opinion to have free licenses.  So I would like to use this
text.

  <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license)
      for works for practical use, in publicly accessible
      repos. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>

  <li id="A4-1"><p>Does not permit nonsharing licenses (or lack of
      license) for any works in publicly accessible
      repos. <strong>(A4-1)</strong></p></li>

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)