[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: repo criteria changes
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: repo criteria changes |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 2021 22:56:50 -0400 |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:44:38 -0400 Richard wrote:
> <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license)
> for works for practical use, in publicly accessible
> repos. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>
>
> <li id="A4-1"><p>Does not permit nonsharing licenses (or lack of
> license) for any works in publicly accessible
> repos. <strong>(A4-1)</strong></p></li>
there does not seem to be any value in the A4/A4-1 separation -
the "any works" in A4-1, makes A4 redundant
- Re: repo criteria changes, (continued)
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/14
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/16
- Re: repo criteria changes, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/24
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/25
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes,
bill-auger <=
- Re: repo criteria changes, hi, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, bill-auger, 2021/06/26
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
Re: repo criteria changes, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/16