[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please review codeberg.org
From: |
hi |
Subject: |
Re: Please review codeberg.org |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:49:43 +0000 (UTC) |
26 Jun 2021 12:09:20 bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community>:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:13:51 +1000 Yuchen wrote:
>> does CI / CD (something codeberg is planning to provide) count as
>> SaaSS? It certainly is doing computing on users' behalf, but sr.ht
>> also offers it but passed the A5 criterion
>
> here is a symptom of the existential crisis of this project,
> to which i have been alluding recently - this particular symptom
> points at the very heart of the issue
>
> (A5) is inherently dubious; because strictly-speaking, the forge
> itself is SaaSS - all forges currently listed and under review
> are SaaSS; because projects could host their own forge
As I understand it, hosting is not saass because it is not computation but just
storage, whereas building and testing are computation.
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, (continued)
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/25
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/27
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/27
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/28
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/28
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Yuchen Pei, 2021/06/28
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/30
- Re: Please review codeberg.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/29
- Re: Please review codeberg.org,
hi <=
Re: Please review codeberg.org, bill-auger, 2021/06/14
Re: Please review codeberg.org, akib8492, 2021/06/26